Should White House Eject Reporters

In a Jan 23, 2017 interview between Kellyanne Conway (Counselor to President Trump) and Sean Hannity at Fox News, Ms. Conway makes a very smart observation.

“If they (White House Reporters) snark, if they roll their eyes, if their Twitter feed is filled with 92 percent anti-Trump tweets, they’re not being reporters, they’re being opinion columnists,”… “They’re being professional political hacks and pundits, and we have a right to call that out.”

Not only does the President of these United States “have a right to call them out”, but the Administration has a right to kick them out – with the peoples support. “Reporters” assigned to the White House are supposed to be News Reporters and not Opinion Columnists. (“supposed to be” are the key words!)

Many “Reporters” are proving themselves to be Opinion Columnists as Kellyanne describes. Would consumers benefit if they were kicked-out of the White House Press Room? Opinion Columnists do not report “News” no more than a Tabloid publishes facts consumers will use to form an opinion and subsequently vote on issues important to America.

This is why White House Reporters are supposed to be News Reporters and not Opinion Columnists – personal Opinions have no business in the Press Corps, utilizing White House resources and consuming the valuable time of real News Reporters who will correctly and effectively communicate White House News to Voters.

People Magazine, Elle, Cosmopolitan, Star, National Inquirer do not have White House reporters for a reason, they do not report news – they sensationalize stories – usually useless nonsense based on the high moral grounds of a small clic.

Over the last eight years with a foundation documented in film 80 years ago, Media has conducted itself in much the same manner as the Hitler Propaganda Machine. The only difference, its foundation has always been backed by wealthy media connected moguls who have sought to control pieces of the country through manipulation of our political process and the politicians they cover.

Hollywood use to depict life in early America fairly correctly in old westerns and most notably in the 1939 film, “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” with James Stewart. While Wikipedia does a great job of outlining the story, the back-story is entirely missing.

From the beginning of the story, as soon as Mr. Smith (a patriotic and relatively simple man of conviction to country and its people) arrives, all Washington News Reporters do is trick him into looking like a total buffoon while having a laugh at his and the country’s expense.

The real story in the film is how a Congressman and influential News Barron manipulates a story about what Mr. Smith is saying during a filibuster he stages once he discovers the Congressman (who recruited Mr. Smith for the job) is using his position as a Congressman to enrich himself in the private sector.

Eighty years later and Media’s once covert attempts at manipulating news in an effort to influence voters and what the country believes is no longer a hidden objective. Media of all types have complained about the Internet since its inception. Politicians jumped on that bandwagon as soon afterwards. What they really fear is being exposed for the lies, sensationalism, misdirection and manipulation they have survived on for centuries.

During the 2016 election cycle, Media and the DNC were exposed (via WikiLeaks) of its collusion and conceited efforts to manipulate the outcome of the 2016 Election. No one denied it and only a few News Agencies with integrity reported on it. Similar to the absence of News Reporting during 2012 when a “video” was blamed by Clintons’ Team to cover up the shortcomings of the Obama Administration just eight weeks before the 2012 Election.

In 2008, it was the Journo-List Group of 450 Professional and Employed Reporters who’s open, publically published written mission was to distract readers from anything negative revealed about then Presidential Candidate Barrack Hussein Obama using misinformation and disinformation.

The entire foundation of the Journo-List Group was to influence the Vote via published stories in favor of a two term Senator with an entire political background rooted in corrupt special interest. With the combined reach of their collective news agencies, they had the power and stated objective to influence the outcome of the 2008 Presidential Election.

So was it coincidental that Obama, the DNC, Media and Clinton Campaign worked together in 2016. Hillary Clinton, while still under FBI and Congressional investigations, exposed of lies to America, Congress and Concealment (private server) was supported by the DNC who colluded to give her the Nomination. Bernie Sanders with a turnout of 25,000 in Los Angeles alone was by far the more popular Democrat Candidate.

Bottom line: White House “Reporters” who prove they are Opinion Columnists, should lose their credentials, clearance and be shown the door. News Agencies who replace them with similar pundits should be given the same consideration as one would give Cosmopolitan and People.

The alternative is one that could put Political segments of Media Industry completely out of business. President Trump and all Government Agencies could easily go direct to consumers (voters) by publishing all Press Events on the Internet. Consumers don’t need some opinionated hack telling them what “they think people say”, when they can hear it in full context directly from the horse’s mouth.

2016 Electoral Vote Margins

There are a total of 538 Electoral Votes
see the Electoral Vote System here )


By The Electoral Votes

Clinton 232 (43.1%)

Trump 306 (56.9%)

Trump Receives 74 Electoral Votes (32%) more than Clinton

Trump Wins Electoral Votes by a Big 24.2% margin

Trump by 13.8% more in Percentage Points


By The Number of Casted Votes*

Clinton 62,521,739 (50.5%) (UCSB = 64,422,781)

Trump 61,195,258 (49.5%) (UCSB = 62,314,814)

Difference 1,326,481 votes (1.0%) (UCSB = 2,107,967)
(Not a Popular Vote of Conventional Evidence)

* Americans cast a total of 123,724,157 (UCSB = 126,737,595) votes for Trump and Clinton
The truth is, no one can actually calculate the popular vote because a significant number of State Counties have not

 presented their final tally. So for now, its all conjecture and predictions by Media feeding the frenzie. The one thing Media has ignored and what the final numbers will not include is the turn out at rally’s leading up to election day. Also

 see “Looking at the numbers” below.


By States

Clinton 21

Trump 31

Trump Wins 60% of States
Trump Wins States by a 33% Margin


An argument can be made for Trump winning the Popular Vote.
As of this count, whether we look at AP (123M±) or UCSB (126M±) numbers, Clinton only received 1.0% (1.7%) more of the total votes (as tallied) Americans cast for Trump and Clinton. So few, the difference could have been made by the deceased or illegal votes as revealed by “Project Veritas“.

More telling is the number of people who turned out in the thousands and tens of thousands at Trump rally’s. Some of those Campaign Rally’s were scheduled at the last minute at wee hours of the morning. And, The People, still turned out! That my friends, sounds like a good description of the Popular Vote!

My favorite part of Election Night was watching a very docile news Media. It didn’t matter what they were saying or what the subject matter was at any particular point as presented by any broadcaster. You could have muted the volume and by 6:00pm PST, you knew exactly who was in the lead and likely the next President of these United States of America.

The look on every one of their faces said Clinton was the down vote. By 8:00pm PST, shock turned to utter dismay as their well-oiled misinformation campaign protecting Clinton combined with strategic attacks and propaganda about Trump and the American Voter completely failed.

But Big Media’s collusion with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton Campaign in this 4 year cover-up for Hillary Clinton may be the biggest story to come out of this election. The American Voter, The People…, have already voiced their conclusion. Unfortunately, Media is still trying to blame everone else.

In the meanwhile, these United States of America has a new President that said he’ll represent The People! Let’s see where he goes.


Looking at the numbers*

Percentages that include the aggregate of votes cast in any election may be intended to misled readers. We’ve learned through WikiLeaks, from “The Veritas Project” and Judicial Watch that the DNC and Media has colluded to misrepresent the facts to make select people look bad while fabricating incidents to support their objectives, party and favored candidates. But no others are lower than Ms. Piggy the bank robber who also did adult films in her decline from Ms. Universe and the anonymous woman who falsified a late stage (2 weeks before election) complaint about Trump but withdrew the complaint a day or two before the election.

Therefore, percentages presented here are based on votes Cast for Trump and Clinton only. While other parties and individuals did participate and collect votes, they couldn’t be considered as real contenders to be elected President of these United States of America. Unfortunately, those votes, while valid, did not actually participate or compete in the more plausible race for the White House.

The race that decisively determined who our next President will be was run between Trump and Clinton. Two contenders with significant support of The People and potential to reach the White House. Those votes are limited to the 123,724,157 (UCSB = 126,737,595) votes cast by Americans for Trump and Clinton. Note: that number was as high as 128,272,155 in the last two weeks.

It’s these votes on which the Electoral Votes will be cast on the first Monday after the second Wednesday this December (19th) when State Electors will pledged their respective Electoral Votes.

The main take-away here is that Media is likely to present many variations of percentages and numbers so its important to understand how and what calculations were made.