The Russian Misdirect
Do you smell smoke? It could be the smokescreen in all these discussions about Russia influencing the American vote and election results. Could this be intended to distract Voters, the American People and Justice Department from the real news and truth about the Political Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization that failed to win the 2016 Election for Hillary Clinton?
This Russian Misdirect appears intended to distract from the snowstorm of news leading up to the election. Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Campaign, Democratic National Party (DNC) and Media collectively colluded to nominate Hillary Clinton at the demise of Bernie Sanders and millions of American Voters that supported his campaign.
These facts come from a combination of sources. It all started to unravel after a three year effort by Judicial Watch who was successful in obtaining through Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) Requests, emails that exposed Clinton and State Department lies about Benghazi, a Video and how Obama lied about his knowledge of that server.
In the later stages of the election process, Wiki-Leaks types added to this firestorm of negative news by disclosing hacked emails from the DNC and Podesta that led to more “transparency” about Democrats in the Party colluding with Media to shape voter knowledge about these events, the candidates and campaigns of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.
Worst, these sources disclosed total disrespect for all American voters by Democrat Politicians including those at all levels of the Democratic National Party. Not just a handful or “basket full of deplorable” American Voters, a term Clinton used to describe those that did not support her campaign.
Of course, Clinton’s public statement was directed at Republican voters. But Clinton indirectly insulted a significant number of Democrat and Independent Voters. Anyone who saw through her double standards, special treatment and the smokescreens created by Media – the communication division of this Political RICO.
Of the three top Political players in this conjecture, Media ignores who has “Russian Political Connections” using disinformation stories about “Russian Business Connections” and “Computer Hacking”. Only Obama and the Clinton’s have documented and highly questionable dealings with Russia.
In 2012, it was Obama’s open microphone slip: ‘After my election I have more flexibility‘, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev’s “understanding” of that statement and commitment to “transmit that message to Vladimir Putin”
Shortly after Obama’s second term election, Russia executed their latest strong hand land grab on Ukraine’s Crimea Peninsula – a practice last executed by the USSR on Poland in the 1980s. A practice last defended by the USA nearly 200 years ago when California “Petitioned” the Federal Government for Statehood in these United States.
It was Hillary Clinton and the State Department intertwined with Russian Financial contributions to the Clinton Foundation that makes the approval and transfer of American Uranium to Russian Interest highly concerning and questionable. The term “Strategic Resource” is so coined as to indicate and assure these resources remain under American control. The mineral Uranium is used to make bombs so we must ask “why would America transfer ownership of that resource to Russian interest”.
Hillary isn’t the only Clinton who’s been working Russia in the background. Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 to speak at an event for Renaissance Capital. Published news indicates the speaking event went so well, Vladimir Putin called Bill Clinton personally to express his gratitude. More applicable to the complete Russia story are connections between Renaissance Capital, Rosatom and millions donated to the Clinton Foundation from people involved in the acquisition of Uranium One by Russian interest and likely government.
Media admits Trump has no property in Russia but news agencies insist he has received financing from Russian investors for holdings in other parts of Europe. Unfortunately these reports are absent specifics to who the investors are, what holdings they financed, when these investments were made and what percentage of the overall syndication of financing Russian interest ‘may have’ participated in.
It’s a silly argument so lets put word associations aside. Whether President Trump used “wiretap” or “surveillence” on Twitter, “seven” (7) characters or “twelve” (12), it all means the same.
Request for warrants to monitor Donald Trump / Associates occurred shortly after Trump became the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party.
As the story continues to unfold, the only thing Media has confirmed is that several attempts were made during the Obama Administration to obtain warrants to monitor Trump and/or his family, associates and businesses. Most (warrants) were rejected until weeks before the election when it was narrowed to nothing of value and nothing specific to the Trump Campaign.
However, somewhere a conversation between Micheal Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak was recorded. By law, the American Citizen in this recording was supposed to be erased and/or hidden by intellegence agents. It was not and the contents or relatd information was provided to and distributed throughout the Obama Administration before it was leaked to the Media by Officials of the U.S. Federal Government.
Coincidentially, these requests for warrants began shortly after Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party in May of 2016. We do not know if other 2016 Presidential Campaigns for the Republican Nomination were also targets of these so called “Russian Connection” claims of Democrats and the Media.
Ambassador Sergey Kislyak appears to be the centerpiece of Democrat claims. But it has been Media who tied Trump’s Associates to a conversation, Senate Office Meeting (due course of business) and surprisingly, attending the same public event. Media has not used their resources or reported whether these type of superficial links exist between Ambassador Kislyak and any of the other 2016 Candidates for Republican Nominee.
Omissions in cases like this, especially with such broad stroke accusations are acts of trickery intended to bait the reader into believing insinuation. Not one of these stories have compared facts known about relations between Obama, Clinton and Russian interest with innuendo about Trump business activities.
Nor have any of these Media people said anything about the involvement of SEIU (Union) and George Soros (Foreign Special Interest) types. The now deminished Glen Beck once mapped out links between American Poltics, Election Influencing and George Soros. “Project Veritas” who initially disclosed how the Clinton Campaign incited violence at Trump rallies and a voter fraud strategy now “exposes prohibited communications” conducted within the ranks.
Hacking from Russia .ru
As far as Russian hacking, this should be accompanied by full investigating of all communist countries including China and North Korea who have been hacking internet firewalls all over the world. To check this, you only need to look at the logs of network equipment in your home by doing a trace-route on IP addresses trying to logon to your private internet connection. They happen every day!
President Obama’s Conclusion on Russian Hacking
A caller to the Rush Limbuagh show provided the paper trail to President Obama’s comments and conclusions on hacking by the Russian Government. The referenced Quote is from Obama’s Dec 16, 2016 Press Conference. Follow the link to a full transcript in the White House Archives for President Obama.
“And so in early September, when I saw President Putin in China, I felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn’t happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out, and there were going to be some serious consequences if he didn’t.
And, in fact, we did not see further tampering of the election process“.
The transcript of the December 12, 2016 Press Conference chaired by President Obama contains a lot of noise about what should and could be done about this or that, when and by whom. The “Official Statement” by President Obama quotes conclusions of both the intelligence community and President Obama at the time.
Investigations into the matter revealed there was “no further tampering of the election process” by Russia after September 3, 2016. So why do Democrat Politicians like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and Media continue to suggest otherwise?
White House Leaks Secret Surveillance Information
“Information about private citizens obtained via Government Surveillance leaked for political purposes“.
Testimony by James Clapper and Sally Yates (who obtained and passed along very sensitive and secret information about a private citizen) disclosed how the White House colluded with the Intelligence Community to obtain secret information collected in a FISA sweep. Details which are also protected by the FISA Warrants used to obtain the information. That information was subsequently passed on to the Washignton Post.
Media collusion in misdirecting the public from Subject Matter Damaging to the Obama Presidency is documented in the over abundence of coverage about the 18 days between the date Sally Yates (Acting Attorney General) and friends told the White House Attorney about Flynn and his subsequent termination. (Note: it took four months to properly terminate James Comey)
Michael Flynn is not an isolated case. According to testimony by James Clapper, there have been 1,933 other Private U.S. Citizens who were inadvertantly captured in surveillance and disclosed in 2016 under the Obama Administration.
Notwithstanding, by the written “Word of Law” Sally Yates was not authorized to have the the information she passed along. In addition, the information she had was leaked to Media (Jeff Bezo’s “The Washington Post” in this case) who “Published” this very sensitive and secret information about private citizens.
The core details being “Michael Flynn talked to a Russian Ambassador” has been the root of all misdirection and misinformation about Russia hacking and influence of the 2016 Election through contact(s) connected to the Trump Campaign.
The real stories we should pay attetiion to is that the Information was:
- Collected & Illegally Stored by Nefarious Means
- Illegally Obtained by White House Officials
- Then Leaked to Media
- And Published by Media
“disgrace President Trump while concurrently covering up the back stories”
The bad actors include the intelligence community (likely FBI) who collected and failed to filter data on an American Citizen, the Justice Department who inappropriately reviewed Private Citizen data, White House Officials (includig and not limited to Sally Yate) who obtained the information and those who subsequently passed it on to Media – who then published the details. The effort (as published) to disgrace President Trump while concurrently covering up the back stories.
This is the Rule of Law — Interpretations of law dynamically modified by Democrat and other Public Servants who selectively apply (or ignore) the “ Words of Law” as necessary to fit an immediate need.
Decide on your own!
Are Russian hacking attempts so unusual or is it the absence of security that’s concerning, who has a history of ‘political connections’ with Russia and who would benefit the most if Hillary Clinton (who we know stole the Presidential Nomination from Sanders) had won the election? Further, with the mounting evidence of collusion within, by and between Government, Politicians, Private Individuals and Media, who has the most to gain by distracting America from the real story?
You know what they say, “if it smells like a skunk”! This one smells like a run for cover. Intentional misdirection to hide the unraveling exposure of Political RICO Conducted by Democrats (many Elected Officials” who openly demonstrate they have no real respect for America, its People or its Laws) and the Media’s continued attempt to cover-up their efforts and contributions to influence America’s 2008, 2012 and 2016 Presidential Elections. “Elected Official” means you (The American Citizen) can do something about it!